• MartianRecon@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    I see you’re getting downvotes, but these same CS people told lots of other careers this very thing not even a handful of years ago.

    I’ve had multiple CS peeps tell me this as I was starting my entertainment career.

    • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      And just like it was a stupid them for them to say to you it’s a stupid thing for others to say to them

    • breezeblock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      People told you “Did they not think to develop a practical skill in case this fad died” a handful of years ago?

      I call bullshit — that sentence doesn’t even make sense.

      • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah dude. Tech people have literally told other career paths to study CS since I was in college, for like 15 years now.

        Shoes on the other foot now.

        • breezeblock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Those are two completely different sentences.

          And I’m not sure why the shoe is on the other foot. The metaphor doesn’t make sense. You’re saying that people who want a stable career should go into entertainment?

          • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            23 hours ago

            The original poster was saying that same condescending advice CS majors would give other people in college, because now the shoe is on the other foot and CS majors are in the shit show just like everyone else is.

            That’s literally it. It’s not that much deeper than that.

            • breezeblock@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I’m sorry you felt condescended to, but I don’t see what “the shit” here is. The author of this thesis has an agenda, and much nonsense has been spilled by people who do not deserve a platform.

              Do you mean automation in general? Yes we’ve been automating everything for a long time, and LLMs are another step in that line — but as someone who works with them every day and is still heavily hiring with large salaries — the “depression” isn’t from LLMs as a tool, or a threat to replace humans, but from a heavy handed directive foisted by executives who no longer know what grass looks like anymore.

              Its the inversion of skill in the workplace where senior reviewers are at the mercy of early career developers who used to be constrained by their talent level — now unleashed by LLM to generate slop they can barely control, the most talented seniors are being crushed by slop while trying to keep the lights on, while management is laying off the same and rewarding the slop makers, so they can collect huge bonuses and move on before the load bearing engineers give out.

              This is a management problem at publicly traded companies. And that is “the shoe in the other foot”? If you say so.

              Mark my words — by the time token prices stabilize to reflect their actual cost, there will be more software engineers being employed in the world — with LLMs as a tool.