At a technical level it’s still young and most likely not as powerful as other similar platforms, but on a legal level the instruction set is an open standard and royaltee-free, so it can’t be embargoed through licensing like ARM or other instruction sets.
Which also had the effect on pushing RISC-V development forward, which is great.
deleted by creator
At a technical level it’s still young and most likely not as powerful as other similar platforms, but on a legal level the instruction set is an open standard and royaltee-free, so it can’t be embargoed through licensing like ARM or other instruction sets.
I’m happy to see more openness in hardware.
deleted by creator
No it’s not, anyone can get a license to create an ARM chipset but you do need to pay for a license.
deleted by creator
It’s neither. It’s a specification that you can use to build your own chip.
So it’s more like MPEG where you can read the doc and create your own implementation.
deleted by creator
How can you have a preference if you don’t understand?
Closed source but if you pay enough you can get the source