• deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    22 days ago

    Because you can now just insert a disc into a blue BluRay drive (which you’ll have needed to rip them to disk anyway) on your PC to play them: just like on a real PS3.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Why did it take 20 years to happen? is the question

      Edit: Previling philsophy of history: things just kind of happen.

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        22 days ago

        If I had to guess, randomly accessing the storage on the disc takes a lot more overhead time compared to reading from an internal drive. Now the emulator is so fast that it can handle the seek time on top of emulating the console.

        • BurgerBaron@quokk.auM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 days ago

          Fat PS3 was only capable of 1X - 2X Bluray read ~9MB/s while Slim and Super Slim were capable of 6X ~27MB/s (changes over the surface of the disc of course) so I don’t think that’s it. PS3 used a rather shitty BSD FAT32 driver for their 5400rpm laptop drives and SSD upgrades were better but still heavily bottlenecked by said driver.

          I can load a decrypted ISO directly in RPSC3 over 1 Gigabit ethernet from a NAS with that inherent horrendous latency (compared to local storage drives, especially random access) and it’ll still load faster than a game would on an actual PS3 on either or even combined storage mediums like many games partial installed to HDD and also used Bluray.