Automated license plate readers (ALPRs) aren’t just helping police investigate crimes anymore. They’re now being used to flag drivers for supposedly “suspicious” driving patterns.

  • rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Combining a car’s movement behaviour via ANPR/ALPR with known drug routes has been going on for over a decade. This is AI in the data science and pattern recognition sense and not the media hyped LLM sense

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    8 days ago

    The Wired article linked by the OP article mentions visiting multiple banks in a week as suspicious behavior that gets flagged… if we had a car (assuming it needs a license plate to attach to you and look up info), that would have pinged my spouse last week. Stupid fucks live in such ivory towers that they’ve never had a bank run out of quarters for the washing machine.

    • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 days ago

      I used to visit the bank way more often when living paycheck to paycheck because it was the only way to get ahead of insufficient funds charges. I was depositing cash from whatever I could sell to pay off the $25 per item overdraft fees.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      I used to be a manager at a smoothie shop. went to like two banks a day with different business needs, guess that’s not allowed… who knew?

    • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Side benefit of the extreme proliferation of gambling: basically every bar has a shitload of quarters now.

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is exactly why law enforcement using a nationwide surveillance system constantly gathering evidence on everyone passing one of their cameras is a 4th amendment violation.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      In a country that has been building its infrastructure around personal automobiles for decades, we cannot make that necessary function of daily life be an automatic consent to targeted analysis.

      I get that cameras pointed at intersections and highways are here to stay. That means there will be records of what happens in public places that can be analyzed for a certain person’s movements once there’s a warrant.

      That’s the whole fucking point of warrants and 4th amendment protections. Just because the technical ability exists to analyze somebody’s Personally Indentifiable Information doesn’t mean you just get to do it. Just like you don’t get to listen to any phone call you want, or plant bugs and trackers on everybody you are curious. (A group of three-letter agencies enters the chat, lol)

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Bingo. Any reasonable judge would toss these cases for not having probable cause.

      This also seems like easy legislation at the federal level. “Driving patterns gleaned from the use of an ALPR system does not, by itself, constitute probable cause.”

    • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Need a Bobby Tables style license plate.

      Heh, I put the text of the joke in this post, but lemmy wouldn’t let me submit. Let’s hope the ALPR guys aren’t as careful lol.

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    If they’re going to keep doing ALPR cameras, license plates should be abolished, as they are compelled speech.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Not driving and not having kids are two things you can do to exempt yourself from a world of possible legal issues.

      • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 days ago

        This one always gets me, walking home from the bar drunk (to avoid driving) can get you thrown in prison, or shot. At least in the US.

        Honestly a cop would give you less hassle if you drove home drunk.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          There’s a video where a guy is just walking home from his shift and gets wellness checked by a passing trooper into being arrested.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          The odds of anyone getting shot walking down the street are infinitesimal. Your odds of getting flattened by a car however…