Sam, just because the digital parrot outsmarts you, it does not need to be intelligent.
Yawn. Wake me up when AI cures all cancers.
These math breakthroughs happened by throwing tens of thousands of agents at a problem to cover all possible angles (with tools developed by other mathematicians) costing the same amount of money as hiring ten top tier mathematicians for several years. Not saying it is not impressive, but not “AI can replace sciencetists” level impressive.
Is that sister fucking Sam Altman?
Just because AI is smarter than Sam Altman doesn’t mean it’s smarter than top scientists. Especially considering Sam is just about as smart as a pile of horseshit.
But apparently not smarter than CEOs or these con artists would all fuck off.
I don’t know, how is this any different than saying Wikipedia knows more than any human on earth? Ok, so you’re computer program has a bunch of information, who cares?
Funny how AI has supposedly surpassed the greatest scientists, yet the greatest scientific discovery here is always announced by the guy selling subscriptions. If it really is that smart, perhaps it could explain to Sam the difference between a peer reviewed breakthrough and a product launch.
If it really is that smart, perhaps it could explain to Sam the difference between a peer reviewed breakthrough and a product launch.
911, I’d like to report a murder.
High-fiving AI. i’m done with this fucking place.
To be fair to AI, the problem with Sam and OpenAI was always PEBKAC.
I’m sorry, Sam. I can only explain it to you. I can’t understand it for you, as well.
I feel like if sam just fucked off. Ai would be smarter, more useful, and less problematic basically over night.
Maybe it could explain to Sam how a statistical model cannot approximate 101% accuracy to the sample data.
If it’s so smart, maybe they should ask it to come up with a viable business strategy, because he sure as hell hasn’t figured it out, lol.
“We have no current plans to make revenue. We have no idea how we may one day generate revenue. We have made a soft promise to investors that once we’ve built this sort of generally intelligent system, basically we will ask it to figure out a way to generate an investment return for you.” - Sam Altman
What a fucking stupid grift that is, how are they falling for it?
Please Sam, put the AI in charge of your company. Pretty please
Is it because he thinks he is the brightest human scientist, but it turns out he’s actually pretty stupid?
yes
I’ll believe it when I hear it from the brightest human scientists, not the glorified salesman who would ironically be perfectly replaced by AI.
LLMs are proof that management isn’t meritocratic.
Ya, Sam, call me when the AI knows what questions to ask that it came up with on its own rather than just scraping…
The more pants-on-head crazy the claims are, the more desperate they are.
Sam Altman has been credibly accused of raping his sister.
…not going anywhere with this, just felt compelled to share.
What makes it credible?
An under-oath deposition by the alleged victim in which she affirmed Altman sexually abused her starting when she was age 3 and lasting until she was age 12.
There are also countless former associates of Altman who have gone on record stating that he’s a compulsive liar and narcissist. That’s obviously not direct evidence of anything, but it establishes a clear pattern of untrustworthy and potentially abusive behavior from Altman.
The civil case was ultimately dismissed because the alleged victim refused to submit to an independent medical examination requested by the Judge… but such refusals are extremely common among people who have been traumatized by sexual abuse and don’t want some stranger poking around their private parts.
How do you define credible in this context?
And how do you know that she and/or the former associates don’t lie?
Do you mean an medical examination years after the abuse happened? What is that supposed to accomplish?
A victim giving a deposition under oath is considered a credible accusation on its face.
I’ve never understood how a oath somehow creates a form of credibility with out some other proof to back it up
It’s still just words. I know lying under oath is a crime and all that. But when most shit just gets settled and rarely actually has teeth towards the rich or famous.
It feels like an oath is just a pretend make believe thing that only the deranged actually think is real.
OK.
