Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for privacy. But between setting up the birthdate when creating my children’s local account on their computers, and having to send a copy of their ID to every platform under the sun, I’d easily chose the former.

I’d even agree to a simple protocol (HTTP X-Over-18 / X-Over-21 headers?) to that.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Is it though? I’ve been saying for a while that direct device verification is the way to go. It would allow for systems that maintain privacy, while also allowing lawmakers to say they’re protecting kids (and enabling parental controls by default, which is important when many are basically tech illiterate). But that wouldn’t help the big tech companies harvest your data, which is why they haven’t lobbied for it. Instead, lawmakers have been pushing the worst form of age verification, which requires all kinds of privacy violations every time you want to jork it.

      • PokerChips@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If lawmakers feel like they need to say their protecting the kids and this is their answer, then we know they’re phony.