𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 days agoWhy would'nt this work?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square224fedilinkarrow-up1550arrow-down131file-text
arrow-up1519arrow-down1imageWhy would'nt this work?lemmy.ml𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square224fedilinkfile-text
It can look dumb, but I always had this question as a kid, what physical principles would prevent this?
minus-squareKorhaka@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up57arrow-down1·2 days agoIf your stick is unbreakable and unavoidable you have already broken laws of physics anyway
minus-squareDasKapitalist@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 day ago If your stick is unbreakable and unavoidable you have already broken laws of physics anyway You have it backwards: if your stick is unavoidable, NOT HAVING IT is the impossible thing.
minus-squareKorhaka@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agoAutocorrected from unfoldable. This is what I get for occasionally browsing on a shitty Amazon tablet. At least it was cheap to the point of being almost free.
minus-squareGnuLinuxDude@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoIn carrot vs stick terms, this is the most unfortunate fellow: he who can’t avoid the stick.
If your stick is unbreakable and unavoidable you have already broken laws of physics anyway
You have it backwards: if your stick is unavoidable, NOT HAVING IT is the impossible thing.
Autocorrected from unfoldable. This is what I get for occasionally browsing on a shitty Amazon tablet. At least it was cheap to the point of being almost free.
In carrot vs stick terms, this is the most unfortunate fellow: he who can’t avoid the stick.