Exactly!

But about those comments, the best thing to do is reply saying that it’s not open source, not censoring messages like in a dictatorship.
That feels abuse to me.

Sorry, on the first read my eyes didn’t read “looking at the modlog”. Where can I see it?

I’ve edited the post with some screenshots where is visible that the moderated comment were not off topic.

My comment was:

what the hack happened here with all the messages deleted by moderator

🤷🏼‍♂️

Removed by mod

I think that there’s been a misunderstanding: the OP said that he has no GPS on the device, so I guessed that he wanted to map the WiFi networks, so my comment.

Hard? I’d say impossible. To map the position of a certain WiFi network, a physical position is needed, if not with GPS, the only alternative that I see is to insert the address by hand.

The first file is seeding and the second one is downloading at…24Kbps. You should add them to all the possible indexers (I’ve no idea how, sorry).

Also flashing custom Head Unit software to your car will be very hard, is not well documented, and likely will void your warranty, giving low incentive for developers to even attempt it :/

I hope that Europe will demand car manufacturers to allow the installation of an after market kit, or better, to install our own software. I’m sure that the open source community will jump in (I’ll chip in for sure!)

As soon as I saw the screenshot I thought about Age of Empire, anybody else?
How many hours didn’t I spend on that fabulous game?!

@squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de 5$ is kinda nothing, but his 5$ plus my 5$ plus your 5$ and all the others that donates, it’s something

@chebra@mstdn.io Thanks a lot for your time explaining that to me!

But the JS code could be checked on the webpage, correct? If so, the page could be trysted (if vetted).

@chebra@mstdn.io but the owner of the server could change it, could it be checked directly on the webpage of the service? Not that I will do it (I can’t, I can’t read that code), I’m just curious.

Oh, ok, now I get it. So it could be checked by a third party if that code is really created by the browser and if it’s not sent to the server, correct?

But it’s the server that creates the URL in the first place, so it must knows it, right? …or wrong?

Do you mind sharing with us what’s incorrect? I’m here to learn.

Oh, now I get it, the whole system works if we trust the guy that provide that system.

How it works: I don’t know about this service in particular, but usually the shared contains the encryption key so like this: example.com/files/file_id/encryption_key or something similar

But if the key is in the URL, that’s provided by the server, where’s the utility of the encryption since the server knows it and so does everyone that has the URL?