• 3 Posts
  • 58 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle





  • Anyone whos been around a lot of dogs will tell you that small dogs are more bitey.

    There you go, thats exactly the point. But they aren’t killing any babies. Pitbulls were bred for fighting. People have Tigers and Lions as pets too. Is that also justified?

    The fact that a pit bull is stronger and can do more damage is also not the dogs fault.

    Of course it’s not the dog’s fault. It is just an animal. It’s the breeders’ and the owners’ fault. Nobody is advocating for euthanasing Pitbulls. Maybe just get a Golden Retriever if you’re just looking for a pet next time.










  • Your first study has even used women who had admitted to the hospital and therefore used the shared hospital toilet bidets. I think this fact alone would make it enough to disqualify it.

    Apart from hospital bidet being a one extra germ filled surface the patient touches, it raises the following questions. Was there a problem with the brand of bidet used in the hospital that might cause more of an uncontrolled spray? Did the particular toilet bowl shape contribute to the result? Non of these stays the same within the general population and any outliers would be cancelled out in a huge dataset.


  • Your linked study is done with 212 subjects. 212!

    With a population that small, you can have any conclusion you’d like. There are billions of people who use bidet showers daily in the world, your study has 212!

    If you believe in the scientific method, you should know that a study has to be verified by many independent studies with big enough data samples before it is accepted as fact. You must surely know that there are studies that conclude that the climate change is a hoax. But the overwhelmingly majority makes these handful outliers or flawed studies.


  • Stay away from the cities if you hate them so much! Let the people who live in them have the bikes, busses, trains and the like. Problem solved! Everyone’s happy, it’s a win win actually.

    You’ve mentioned in another comment that cyclists make your rural life inconvenient. It’s same with cities, your car’s presence makes city dwellers’ lives inconvenient. Are you willing to have a compromise that cyclists will not use the rural roads as long as you don’t drive on city roads (I am only suggesting this because you wanted cyclists off the road)?

    I also have to point out that you really speak like a guy who haven’t watched any of the channels I mentioned. The problems you mentioned have been already solved elsewhere.

    As far as cities go, strongly believe that part of problem with traffic congestion is a lack of space for automobiles.

    Your belief doesn’t align with data. It’s been shown time and time again that no matter how many lanes you add, congestion levels always return to original levels. On the other hand, when lanes are dedicated to buses and trams, congestion is reduced. But you must have known this already if you’ve watched NotJustBikes’ video titled “The best country in the world for drivers”