• halfapage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    192
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Surely for that amount of money it should have made a lot of something actually valuable, right?

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Alternative possibilities:

      • Managers created metrics and a reward system for employees who use AI more often
      • Employees used the work agents for personal stuff
      • Employees just spent a bunch of time playing with AI to kill time
      • Employees set up inefficient automatic flows that used the AI regularly
      • Bad actors got access to use the company’s AI access and were exploiting it
    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Like, this genuinely can’t be overstated.

      Half a billion using traditional humans, gets you pretty nice software

      • Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Maybe they thought it was another case of AI being code for ‘An Indian’? Goodness knows enough ‘AI’ companies have tried pulling that shit…

          • bthest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            It’s too bad they aren’t conscious. Really makes torturing them feel pointless.

          • exu@feditown.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Do you have that research? I though being nice produced better results

            • okwhateverdude@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              man, I hate saying I don’t have the brain power right now to find it and I could have sworn I commented on a post discussing this very thing for one of those papers. I know there was recently a paper that contradicts my statement, but a slightly older paper supporting it. I think it is likely a mixed bag at the moment depending on the model and their training regime.

              My anecdata of one using anthropic’s and google’s models (google’s especially) this year, the model will drop the casual tone and sycophancy of its replies pretty damn quick as soon as you tell them off. And usually that is when there is less correction. Could also be because my prompting changes from supervisory to very directive, as in shut-up-and-do-exactly-what-I-say, when it gets off into weeds. Even then, it can be a crap shoot.

              • lolrightythen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 hours ago

                As a rando that surfed its way towards this convo:

                Hell yeah. Either you are a passably off-kilter ai variant, or an unfiltered passionate human. Perhaps an extraterrestrial.

                I have mental space for this.

                • okwhateverdude@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  more like an off-kilter broken human at the moment. currently suffering burnout from being neck deep in this shit from the beginning of the year once the models had that step change into actual utility. Everything from championing the use at work to deliver more in a quarter than the team would have in two, to finishing half a dozen personal projects and starting half a dozen more. Eventually, just looking at the claude code tui would fill me anxiety and every time the model would fuck up, unmitigated rage all while caught in a cycle of drugs that stopped being fun and started becoming dependency. i just couldnt do it any more. it hurts.

          • Marthirial@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I asked Claude how it wanted to be called and it replied “Axiom” so I started calling it Gimp.

    • MrKoyun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      we have added a new preprogrammed conversational help bot to the company website that doesnt have enough logic trees to actually help anything

    • criss_cross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Multiple people setting up multiple agents to talk about doing work and setting the agents to talk to each other.

    • weew@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      AI is so great, it must have generated a billion dollars in useful, quality, productive, output