• cjoll4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    If you’re a spellcaster, sure, just for the stacking bonus to spell save DC and spell attack rolls. But then it’s better to compare it against a magic staff, not a shortsword…

    For actually stabbing people, I think Knife of the Undermountain King is better.

    I dunno, who told you Rhapsody is better and what was their explanation when you asked them how?

    • NSFW_Metal_Head@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 days ago

      They argued that getting the kills for Rhapsody was easy and the effect lasted until long rest.

      My argument was KOTUMK was more consistent.

      • cjoll4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 days ago

        Looks like Rhapsody has an ability I didn’t know about which lets you consume your +3 from Scarlet Remittance to either guarantee a crit, heal yourself, or give a target disadvantage on saving throws.

        https://bg3.wiki/wiki/Scarlet_Feast

        I still think which one is better depends on how many spells you’re going to be casting.

      • tomi000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        If it really lasts until a long rest thats pretty good. From 2 stacks onward the damage output should be better. +2(3) atk roll and +2(3) dmg vs +5% crit chance and ~+0.67 dmg from Organ rearranger

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Better, for specific situations.

    The attack and spell save DC bump at 3 is really damn solid for casters in specific. Pair it with some acuity, and hello guaranteed control spells.

    As a weapon used by a melee fighter? Not at all.