• deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        18 days ago

        Because you can now just insert a disc into a blue BluRay drive (which you’ll have needed to rip them to disk anyway) on your PC to play them: just like on a real PS3.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          Why did it take 20 years to happen? is the question

          Edit: Previling philsophy of history: things just kind of happen.

          • otacon239@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            18 days ago

            If I had to guess, randomly accessing the storage on the disc takes a lot more overhead time compared to reading from an internal drive. Now the emulator is so fast that it can handle the seek time on top of emulating the console.

            • BurgerBaron@quokk.auM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              17 days ago

              Fat PS3 was only capable of 1X - 2X Bluray read ~9MB/s while Slim and Super Slim were capable of 6X ~27MB/s (changes over the surface of the disc of course) so I don’t think that’s it. PS3 used a rather shitty BSD FAT32 driver for their 5400rpm laptop drives and SSD upgrades were better but still heavily bottlenecked by said driver.

              I can load a decrypted ISO directly in RPSC3 over 1 Gigabit ethernet from a NAS with that inherent horrendous latency (compared to local storage drives, especially random access) and it’ll still load faster than a game would on an actual PS3 on either or even combined storage mediums like many games partial installed to HDD and also used Bluray.