Let’s say I, a middle aged cis man went to my doctor, wanting gender affirming care, and my doctor wanted to provide - what, if anything, would the treatment/care consist of? Just making sure my testosterone level was up to Hegseth-approved standards?


And your point is?
Seriously, as a tangent it’s fine, but it’s rather badly formed. I don’t think anyone claimed that diabetes is gender affirming. And nobody with sense could read my comment and think that I’m claiming either that, or that a future definition of gender affirming care won’t involve things which are substantially similar to treatments currently grouped under that heading.
So, I’m not sure why you’re bringing heart transplants or diabetes up, it makes zero sense in this context.
That’s what you said. Not all care is about gender because not everything about being alive is about gender. That is irrespective of whether your cis or trans. That isn’t stretching the concept to the breaking point, but well beyond it.
Oh, ffs I have no clue how you read that and got some kind of direct link to unrelated shit, but whatever.
So what you’re saying is when you said “all medical care” you didn’t really mean “all medical care”. And somehow my examples of medical care aren’t related to medical care. My bad, clearly.