Hear me out on this, please.

Let’s say that I spend $5k on health insurance in a year, but don’t go to the doctor or have any medical issues in that year. Where does my money go? It disappears. I basically just gave away my money, and received nothing in return. However, if I took that $5k and simply put it into a personal savings account instead of giving it away to a health insurance provider - that money stays right there if and whenever I decide to use it. It even collects interest.

I realize that with a health insurance provider, you’re (supposedly) getting discounted rates on medical services - but if your money is just disappearing into thin air if you don’t happen to need those medical services in a given year, are you really saving money? It just seems like a really big scam to me - what am I missing?

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Like all insurance it deals with the possibility of a bill so large no savings could cover it. Its like life insurance does not make sense unless you die young assuming you paid into it your whole life. The savings is better right up to the point you get some catastrophic medical issue which could happen in your twenties.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    So I’m not sure what is happening in this post. The premise is ludacris and the top responses are nonsense.

    A five mile ambulance ride to the hospital for non emergency services is like 5k alone.

    A simple conversation and basic exam by a doctor is 300 bucks on the low side. That’s just the doctor with a stethoscope checking your heart and lungs.

    If you have to go to the emergency room you’re done.

    That’s why we have health insurance here. It’s basically a racket.

  • MonkRome@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    In the past 3 years my father has been billed millions of dollars in healthcare. If he had a health savings instead of insurance, he would simply be dead now. The better option is public single payer healthcare. Insurance sucks, but health savings is simply worse. Pooled risk spreads out costs. If the government pools the risk then they eliminate the needs for constant financial profit growth at the expense of the insured.

    • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Yep! Having medical costs be a “fend for yourself” system is super ableist. I had a double lung transplant in 2014 thanks to the affordable healthcare act, thanks Obama, and if my “personal savings” had been the only thing I had to pay for it I’d be dead. Lots of people, like myself, are born disabled, we deserve to exist, having a system where I still get healthcare even if it costs a couple million to put me in ICU for six months and do 12 hours of surgery is the only humane option. Some bills just can be covered by the very vast majority of us, and like you said single payer healthcare is the obvious answer, insurance sucks but it still covers a very important gap

  • jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    One, as many point out, insurance is about covering the extremes. Most people won’t use as much money as the premium, but others…

    For example, a relative of mine got a rare cancer, that is pretty treatable, but the medicine alone would have cost 10k a month, ignoring the frequent oncologist appointments. No amount of savings would have covered that. Even a single visit to an ER could more than wipe out a couple of years of premiums.

    The other thing is the discounts are no joke. Now if you are truly uninsured, many of the providers will upon negotiation give you some severe “break”, but you have to fight every time and your results are unpredictable. The insurance companies have lots of leverage, and the providers jack up prices to make the negotiated rates look good compared to their alleged list prices.

  • KombatWombat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Most people lose money to insurance. It’s a method of mitigating risk. You’re accepting a modest regular payment in exchange for not needing to build up a big reserve (or go into debt) in case something really expensive comes down the line.

    Life insurance is kind of similar. If people saved the money they pay for it until they do die, on average that saved amount would be more. But having life insurance while healthy and working means that in the unlikely event of your death, your beneficiaries will be compensated for the loss of the income you provide when otherwise they would be SOL.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Because hospitals charge a thousands dollars for an aspirin.

    Insurance only has to pay like a dollar. But YOU would be lucky to haggle it down to $40.

  • lordnikon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    5 days ago

    Let try this, why don’t we pool our money into a big savings account of pretax dollars for everyone in the entire country and add a supervising org that works with hospital networks to keep cost low through collective bargaining. At some point we the hospital networks become a single national network.

    • Asafum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      5 days ago

      Ok so I hear you, but where do I get to deny claims and make $638,384,274,836.67 for myself while you die of a completely treatable disease? It’s not a fair system to me so I’m going to bribe lobby Congress and get my way.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 days ago

        The fix is clearly to have a group of non-medical people in charge of that pooled pot of money who can deny payments for arbitrary reasons.
        I think this is the most sane solution

        • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Most sane seems a bit of a stretch, but I will grant you that given the current system sane-er definitely works.

      • lordnikon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 days ago

        Lol well we have video from last year that showed what we should do with you in that case.

  • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Two answers.

    1. The theory behind why insurance is supposed to exist in the first place.

    I put 5k in a health insurance account every year. Most years I don’t spend it all and it slowly builds. Let’s say I have like 30k after a few years with some interest. But then I get cancer and it costs $50,000 plus $10,000 per year after that. I now am short $20,000 and I need to double my annual spending on health insurance and am no longer saving, leaving me and my family in financial trouble.

    Now consider I pay 5k every year in health insurance, and most years the insurance company takes that as profit, but if I get cancer, they will cover all the expenses for just my continuing $5k/yr instead of the actual, much higher cost. The insurance company can do this and still make a profit because the vast majority of people who pay $5k/yr don’t need $5k of treatment, so it amounts to more than enough to cover the couple people who need more.

    1. The toxic system in the US

    A lot of medical costs in the US are massively inflated because the hospital says “this is worth $10,000” and the insurance company says “well only pay you $5,000 for that” and then they tell you “we saved 50% on your bill! Aren’t we great!” But the real value of the thing is like $1000 and both the hospital and the insurance company and other parties like whoever is making “the thing” are in on the whole nonsense pricing thing.

    This ultimately makes it even harder to get reasonable medical treatment without insurance in the US.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Because you probably won’t get a multi-million-dollar cancer, but might. Or, looked at another way, someone will get cancer, and with insurance everyone is just a little less well off, instead of a few people being absolutely ruined.

    I know little about American healthcare, but that’s how insurance in general works. (From what I’ve heard, there’s also a premium that just goes to anticompetitive bullshit in that specific case)

    • tomi000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Thats how health care works in civilized countries. In the US its more like “everyone is way worse off, the people who get really sick are still ruined because insurance fucks them over and you still have to pay for going to the doctor”.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Private health insurance doesn’t get involved with doctors or hospital treatments at all where I live. It’s more for various outpatient goods, and dentists/eye doctors if you’re too rich to qualify for the federal program.

    • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Exactly. Health insurance covers more than I could ever save. The fact that we all she pretty well means that well need more medical support for a longer time when were old. Once your personal savings account is empty you won’t have acces to expensive treatments anymore.

      The more people buy in to healthcare, the cheaper the individual cost gets.

  • TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    how much is in your savings account? Colleague just got an upper endoscopy, in a hospital for some reason: $58,000.

    Insurance helps if you see doctors regularly, and can hopefully keep you from, like, losing your house if you get some catastrophic illness or injury.

    • tomi000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      With OPs figure of 5k/year that would be around 8 years of saving in an ETF portfolio. How often do you need an endoscopy? Not sure if 5k is a realistic number though.

      • TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        -shrug- Neighbor had a multi generational history of digestive tract cancers. She got upper endoscopies and colonoscopies every other year. (Of course, she had them done at free standing surgical centers, so the price was considerably lower than in the hospital.) Don’t know how much she had to pay to have two feet of cancerous intestine removed in the hospital, though.

  • Balisada@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    I have Acute Myloid Leukemia.

    In the State of Oregon, to treat that with a side trip through “lets get a bone marrow transplant land” it costs $2 million dollars.

    I had a doctor state that they don’t know what causes Leukemia, but it’s not genetic, so there is nothing I could have done to prevent it and my family didn’t give it to me.

    Are you going to save up $2 million dollars in case you get diagnosed with something that does not have any symptoms? Because I didn’t have any. One month I was fine, and the next I couldn’t get to from my car to my desk at work without stopping somewhere along the way to rest.

    To a certain degree, I see your point about paying for something that you are not really using. It sucks. But if you need it, it is really nice that you already have it.

    There is a reason why some people literally go bankrupt with medical bills. Even with insurance, it can still get pretty costly.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    You’re not missing anything, it is a giant scam.

    Your money is going to the profits if the shareholders of your health insurance company.

    The only part of the US economy that is actually growing substantially in terms of workforce… is the healthcare sector.

    And that’s not mostly doctors and nurses.

    It’s mostly paper pushers.

    There are so many healthcare paper pushers now, that if you actually waved a magic wand and implemented a single payer system with much more sane pricing for everyone and a less bloated set of paper pushers… something like a million or two million peoole would lose their jobs.

    This country is fucked.

    Everyone trying to explain to you how the concept of insurance works is giving you a needlessly complex explanation.

    There are many countries that have public health care that works better and costs less, some that even have private insurance options that are no where near as insanely price gauging as the US system.

    Our system is a giant, legal, fraud/scam, that intentionally makes things as expensive as they possibly can be, and delivers as little service as it possibly can, all that corporate c suite and shareholders can quite profit off of your misery.

  • csm10495@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 days ago

    Insurance is always a technical gamble. If you need it for something moderate to big you’ll easily run up a much higher bill than 5k. Could even be enough to eat the years of savings you had.

    If you had paid that 5k that year, you’d still have your savings.

    • obelisk_complex@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Until we get to the total plan limits. They don’t cover costs to infinity, you know. And for something like cancer treatment, most plans don’t actually offer enough coverage to sustain it for years, so you’re still on the hook for tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars after all is said and done.

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    So being Canadian I have a different outlook. My province used to charge $1500 per year for health coverage so that everything was “free” at point of service. Then we changed political parties and they dropped it to $750 per year, years later to $0 per year. (The idea being if you are struggling then any monthly payment could would be a hardship).

    So now we pay nothing for healthcare and my income taxes went up $270 on first 50K, but at least I’m not paying $1500 or $750.

    So cheap health care and still save 5K for retirement