• zen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If I won’t own them, I’m not buying them. This is them shooting themselves in the feet.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I can prove in home that I don’t own any playstation past the 4.

    Let’s see who loses.

  • Clutter@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Even if they succeed with a weird judge to prove this… It’s not the point. We want to own stuff, so either make “owning” available or we stop buying/renting.

    • ikirin@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also, there is the common online sentiment “If buying isn’t owning, then piracy is not stealing” and I can’t help but believe that this will permiate even deeper into the gaming culture.

  • tigermountain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Sony pushes the idea that “reasonable consumers would not be misled” into believing they own the games in their digital library”.

    Wasn’t this the same basic legal outcome Fox News received when they were sued and it was determined that ‘no reasonable viewer’ would think Tucker Carlson was anything but entertainment? That worked out well.

    • zerofk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      But people who are easily fooled by such things are exactly the ones who need extra protection. Many laws exist to protect the weaker members of society.

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 days ago

    Imagine how well digital games would sell if they showed up in your cart like: 1 x Revokable License for God of War $69 See Terms and Conditions* [Confirm Payment]

    • Terms: we will do whatever the fuck we want. Conditions: whenever we want.

    There’s a reason they say “Buy” instead of “Pay”.

    It’s been going on for generations, but it’s no less dishonest for all that. Software sellers write complex EULAs for which the only valid answer is “Agree” because the store won’t take an open box back and the software won’t install unless we pretend to agree, so even us legitimate software enjoyers are pirates in our hearts. Meanwhile normies don’t even think about it that much. Fuck this whole system, but double fuck an online service that says “purchase” but will steal it back later. Fuck that.

    • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      1x temporary license to play. Duration of license unspecified.

      Pretty sure in the past it was at least considered a lifetime license.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        *Lifetime for the time the product/service is alive

        If they end the thing, they can just pretend they did a rewrite and invalidate the current version/not develop it any further and maybe offer a migration discount (lol).
        I’d prefer the model of “Buy version X for at least x years of feature updates and Y days of security updates”.

  • xelar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Its crazy how everybody got used to rental prices as high as physical copy.

    • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Good thing I buy games on gog so I own them and I could copy them to a DVD if I really wanted to.