A high profile hacking group claims it has breached multiple FBI-related services and stolen data “on all FBI employees and applicants.” A representative of the group, called ShinyHunters, told 404 Media the data includes FBI agents’ names, home addresses, phone number, and information on their spouse.
The data breach could be massively significant and may have all sorts of national security and counterintelligence implications. Criminals from the same ecosystem as ShinyHunters have previously used hacked data like phone records to track, intimidate, and harass the FBI agents investigating them. The highly sensitive data could also be a boon to foreign intelligence agencies who want to better understand how one of the most important law enforcement and intelligence agencies in the U.S. operates. And if the data fell into the hands of more criminals, FBI agents and their spouses could face serious threats to their safety.
“We hacked the FBI. We hold data on all FBI employees and applicants,” the representative of the group told 404 Media.
The representative provided 404 Media with a sample appearing to contain the personal data of 5,000 FBI employees. That data included an alleged address, phone number, date of birth, and in some cases details on their spouse.
We’ve all heard about breaches in security by hackers affecting so many millions of people, but I never hear about that data leak being used against the innocents. Like, it has no effect on we the poors.
They seem to hold our data for ransom, and steal crypto directly from the rich, because of course they do, that’s where the most profit is. And, that is why they’re so dangerous… to the rich.
If you dig into this a little you’ll see plenty of accounts of The Com associates doing awful things against children, but I suspect that’s a very small part of what a few of them do, it’s just hyped and pushed forward to make us hate them all. In fact it’s quite possible that within the larger community, those few players are themselves, shunned, the same way Christians shun but don’t condemn the more radical members of their cult. But, the only way to hear that side of the story is to be in The Com. We’ve all seen this happen in online communities--outsiders condemning an entire large group for the actions of a few, who are shunned within the group.
Remember, we’ll never get the whole story from one side, and the story we do get will be biased in favor of the side that tells it--there will always be distortions, lies of omission, and outright fabrications and lies. The same way we’re wary of content now because of AI, we should be skeptical of any claims made, and the more powerful the claimant, the more skeptical we should be that we’re getting the whole story.
You should see it. If you have the eyes for it.
So… How many of them had engaged in beastiality prior to being hired? 🤔
If it’s profitable it’s legal. Just cut Trump in on it and there will be no consequences.
My favorite part is that the exploit was an Oracle issue. The Ellison family sucks.
Didn’t oracle just pay out a settlement for a data breach?
selling of parts paramount to the saudis, they overextended thier purchases.
Before they leak it, they should coerce the FBI to leak the Epstein Files and then leak the FBI stuff anyway. Would be hilarious. We be top tier.
That won’t work though because the federal government doesn’t negotiate with terrorists*.
Instead, they do their negotiating with rich pedophiles.
Instead, they do their own terrorism. FTFY
You appear to have two paragraphs that are accurate… Without a footnote. What was the * for?
:p
To indicate terrorists are subjective
I honestly DGAF about the employees, I do care about the internal documents indicating what they’re collecting on innocent parties and sitting on regarding the rich and dirty ones.
Release it all please.
The government needs to provide all FBI employees with 1 free year of credit monitoring. That free year is the resolution I’ve seen from the corporations that were hacked. Remember when a couple credit bureaus were hack multiple times and they provided this? The FBI should also provide compensation for the hack if employees sign up in time. Usually you get like $20 for the data leak.
I think when OPM was hacked that is what employees got lol
Yup, it just ran out recently.
Then years later they can claim the $4 check from the settled class action lawsuit
Maybe if our justice system actually punished people, things would be different
How many more poor’s need to be punished for a different outcome?
Prove it. List which ones are into beastiality. I want see just how big Kash Patel’s eyes can pop when he has to explain it.
Weirdly, this is the most normal he’s ever really looked, even with the external eyeballs. Never realized just how big of an impact those bugeyes have.
his coke eyes are designed to see DOGS of all breeds from anywhere on the world.
why is this giving
Love that show.
What slow?
The Amazing Digital Circus. It’s a great animated show, well worth a watch if your brain got a sprinkle of brain rot, but it still deals with some good subject matters.
Judging by their past work, this group is probably bluffing in an attempt to extort easy marks.
Turns out firing all the experts and replacing them with incompetent sycophants has consequences
It’s a real shame the feds don’t hire the nerds who might’ve prevented this. The tl;dr is hiring freezes, reinstated fitness tests, and drug usage disqualifications put cops behind computers, not IT. Who saw that coming.
Instead, they hire the people who do it.
In wandering around the entrance to the rabbit hole, I came across the Wikipedia article about The Com, which is a lose umbrella organization that includes many hacker communities, including the one accused of hacking the FBI.
There’s this:
The Com is connected to a group of skinheads active in Russia and Ukraine responsible for random attacks on people and acts of murder.[14] Edward Coristine, a high-ranking employee of the DOGE, US government organization, was a former member of The Com.[15]
Plus DOGE got rid of basically all the competent cybersecurity professionals.
Smoking the Devil’s lettuce? GTFO. Into fucking dogs? You’re hired!
But they do allow bestiality now.
How is this the one photo where he doesn’t look like he’s holding in a massive shit?
Dogs really are the best.
To me he always looks like he got caught masturbating to horse porn by his parents. I’m amazed he managed to take a decent photo as well.
That’s his afterglow face.
He does look a little flushed.
Right? They’re gonna relax the standards for dog fuckers but not for weed?
Weed intoxicates the brain . That’s bad.
Names/addresses/ages/phone numbers/applications, shit they could have just found the login for one of the hiring groups indeed profiles, lol.
Meh, these are the same fucks who breached the Canvas backend and held student data for ransom. I don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like - they’re just another bunch of assholes out to make a profit.
Interestingly they are taking a different route with this data than they usually do (in the article).
That was fucked up and they are wrong for that but if they keep going after feds I’m all for them.
Wish they could leak the Epstein files (without pics and vids).
Their talents were wasted on Canvas if they have this kind of capability.
Either that or, the FBI’s database just has ultra piss poor security which sounds about right anymore.
If they were “going after” the feds, they’d release everything they got instead of bragging about what they got. Either they got nothing or they’re holding it for ransom, but if it’s the latter what are their demands? None of this is passing the smell test.
" don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like" - you should. This opens all of them up to blackmail and worse by foreign govts. Massive problem for both you, me, and everyone else. The first Tom cruise mission impossible movie was about this very same thing except it was the CIA.
Don’t take a fragment of a sentence out of context to make me say something I didn’t. What I said was that even if they attack someone I don’t like, I still won’t celebrate it because I know what their motivation is.
What you said was “I don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like - they’re just another bunch of assholes out to make a profit.” not “even if they attack someone I don’t like, I still won’t celebrate it because I know what their motivation is.”.
In or out of context, "I don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like"means the exact same thing. It’s a stand alone statement not impacted by your second sentence.
Your rephrasing makes more sense and the two parts of your sentence can not be separated without changing the meaning.
In or out of context, "I don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like"means the exact same thing. It’s a stand alone statement not impacted by your second sentence.
Incorrect on all counts. “Whether they attack someone I hate or not doesn’t matter” is what the complete sentence conveys. Quit playing semantic games to make me say the opposite. Actually just get blocked for being an unserious bad faith poster.
In or out of context, "I don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like"means the exact same thing. It’s a stand alone statement not impacted by your second sentence.
That’s just not true. The fact that it can form a complete sentence on its own doesn’t divorce its meaning from the surrounding context.
In my favourite example, “I want to make sure the children die with the parent” is a complete sentence, but outside of a programming context, it’s quite fucked up.
In this case, the sentence you quoted is equivalent to a parenthetical to add nuance to the second half you omitted: “They’re just another bunch of assholes out to make a profit (even if they target a government agency I don’t like).” It’s the opposite of a standalone statement: It’s the subordinate qualification to a different, standalone statement.
Just because you can quote it outside its context doesn’t mean that it’s independent of context.
wrong, the following statement had no impact on the first.
I’m really not sure why it seems like most people here think context matters, but you keep insisting that it doesn’t. The two parts of that second sentence, which you treat as separate statements, were literally linked with a dash. It’s also not like the statement or its parts stood alone:
The first sentence implies disapproval of the hackers’ previous antics. The second one first concedes that they also hit someone the commenter dislikes, which in that context is a clear setup for a “but”, which follows and makes it clear that this isn’t enough to redeem them, since the motive likely isn’t ideological nor political, but plain greed.
You’re taking a sentence in isolation and pretending its meaning is self-contained. That’s not how human language works.
It is syntactically two independent clauses (or a compound sentence) joined by an em dash rather than a single, indivisible thought. Each half contains its own subject and verb structure. Punctuation does not equate to inseparability. You assume second half acts as a pivot (“setup for a ‘but’”). But look at the actual words: there is no “but” or ideological reversal present. They were expressing two distinct emotional stances: a political/institutional cynicism (“I don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like”) followed by a cynical motive attribution (“they’re just another bunch of assholes out to make a profit”).
By everyone do you mean in the globe, or is everyone limited to America.
Removed by mod
Mods abusing rule 3.
Edit - pointing out that concern over data security is a moot point after a gaggle of non-security cleared Musk datascrapers at the start of Trump’s term already stole untold data, and have no protocol to secure it like the government does is factual and poignant. “Be excellent to each other” is a flagrant abuse of censorship.
in fairness, you called someone “retarded”. some people on here get triggered around the word “retarded”, even if they were not the target of the word, they somehow felt you meant they were “retarded”.
remember. don’t use “retarded” use “mentally deficient”.
just want to make sure everyone is aware here. even if you were talking about flame “retardant” material, it’s still not acceptable. the new term is “flammably deficient”.
Technically the word ‘idiot’ was utilised for the highest grade of mental deficiency. Do you feel that word should be banned too?
Not trolling, I’m genuinely curious.
any retard with half a brain can see that an idiot is far less deficient than a retard.
flammably speaking.
So, “Hacked” in this case means asked Grok where they could buy a “Female Body Inspector” tshirt and Grok coughed up the personal details of everything FBI?
Apparently I’m OOTL on some weird Kash Patel shit?
He wants to be Mr Hands.
He really loves animals.
we had couch fucker, and now we have bear fucker.
get these two a room with a nice couch and rug and they’ll have a blast.
Or dress up Patel as a racoon and send RFK in.
OrAnd dress up Patel as a racoon and send RFK in.
We already knew that.
Is this related to the hack? (Is it the spouse part?)dogs, cats, horses, sheep, goats, and cows. and the occasional domesticated ASS.
